His most recent piece in Slate is a one-pager, and reads like a blogpost. The title? How Blind Salamanders Make Nonsense of Creationists' Claims. That's funny.
Here are some snippets that tend to illustrate his funniness:
- The creationists (to give them their proper name and to deny them their annoying annexation of the word intelligent)...
- Hold it right there, says Ann Coulter in her ridiculous book Godless: The Church of Liberalism. "The interesting question is not: How did a primitive eye become a complex eye? The interesting question is: How did the 'light-sensitive cells' come to exist in the first place?"
- It's only once we shake our own innate belief in linear progression and consider the many recessions we have undergone and will undergo that we can grasp the gross stupidity of those who repose their faith in divine providence and godly design.
I have also decided, after noticing his observation, that I will not use the phrase "Intelligent Design" anymore. Any suggestions for replacements? Poof!-Lifeists? Whizbang Worldism? Claymanism? WutzSaientz? It's Not True Because I Don't Like It...ism?
But seriously, Creationists? Please stop this nonsense. If we're not expected to believe in your God, then let's not pretend we're supposed to believe in anything else resembling ONLY religion.
5 comments:
Oh but you *are* expected to believe in God. That's the point. And for the record, I like "Poof! Life-ists."
Ah yes. But wouldn't it make more sense to try and sell God by offering a NOT STUPID product? Why can't Christians sell 2+2=4 instead of 2+2=nomathbecausegodsaidso?
I like Poof!-Lifeists too. But it just doesn't work without the exclamation point, but it doesn't work WITH it either...so you gotta add a hyphen and then it looks weird and...yeah...
haha, i clicked on the link to amazon for Coulter. the reviewer tags are hilarious.
Isn't "Poof! Life-ists!" already taken by the big bang theory?
Thanks
Fair point. But I feel more comfortable with "first-mover" ideas of the universe as a whole, because they are not diametrically opposed to all science, observation, and evidence.
I think it's more reasonable for me to be agnostic about the source of the universe than for someone else to claim to have an extremely simple explanation to the vast complexity of life: Jesus did it.
Post a Comment