My fucking asshole of a professor assigns problem sets everyday. Plus, he's one of the guys who still decides to cold call random students every single day, believing that all students should be prepared everyday. It's just so unnecessary.
Aside from the 20 pages of reading every day, which I can live with, the problems he assigns often include 15-20 sub parts. Furthermore, the problems all refer to statutes we have not seen yet in the materials.
Today's problems? References to 23 different statutes in the supplement, many of which are a page long.
Fuck this guy. With a big rubber dick.
17 comments:
Pensions sucks just as bad. Except that its not at Harvard. And I do not have enough free time (as you mistakenly asserted in a previous comment). I'm taking 17 friggin' credits, and have been up since 4:30. Were it not for Evidence, I wouldn't even have a chance to read ESPN
You know what your problem is? You took *SECURED TRANSACTIONS*. There's your problem.
Well why the hell would you take Pensions?
At least secured transactions forms the backbone of the financial system...so that people can live in their own homes, drive cars, start businesses, expand on the germ of an entrepreneurial idea, and ultimately live life. (and of course have their mortgages foreclosed, have their cars repossessed, have their businesses dragged under by unsustainable debt, lose their savings in their start-ups, and ultimately kill themselves.)
Note: Did you know that secured transactions used to be a required class for every law student to take?
You're all just a bunch of hippies.
I do not appreciate the tenor of this "blog."
-ALK*
*The author of this satirical comment is not purporting to, in fact, be the individual whose initials are herein listed.
Allan Luther King?
Why I took pensions? I have a means of selecting classes, and I am sure that JA and pretty much everyone else will criticize me without cessation. But its me. I mean, don't you expect it?
First, I look at the times the classes are offered. Early morning and late afternoon and evening classes mean more time for work. Which means more $ for me.
Secondly, I check the demographics. Old school white men work best. That means I won't be subjected to too much left wing rhetoric (usually, although Mandelker threw me).
And in this way, rather than learning politics, I'm actually learning the law instead of being forced to embrace the liberal vision of a namby-pamby Socialistic Republic with an homosexual army flamboyantly defending a citizenry suckling at the teat of the welfare state. Fred for Prez (or possibly Newt I haven't decided)!
SJ
P.S. I'm really just bitter because NYU thinks liberals are smarter than conservatives.
P.P.S. Wait, if I'm "dumb because I'm a conservative" shouldn't Michigan Law School have given me some extra points on my application? (That just pissed off JA)
P.P.P.S. Dadgumit, Slate says the study is for shit. I'm smarter than all of you (except for DA)(and possibly AJ)(and JA is smarter than me as well)(and probably ADM's brother is smarter than me). Damn I'm the least intelligent reader of this blog. With the possible exception of the geology girl, who hasn't posted in awhile, so hopefully she doesn't get offended. Plus, I haven't met her.
Wow. Jesus. Ok...here I go.
First, you made a gross miscalculation with geology girl. Her IQ substantially surpasses the genius threshold. (Really.) (Sorry for the disclosure jojo. All in the name of republican bashing.)
Second, your pension rationale defines namby pamby. And you like teats.
Third, I'm fairly sure your UM comment didn't make any sense.
Fourth, Bush Republicans are stupid. Principled Conservatives are not, just unrealistic.
Fifth, there's some Indian readership on this blog, although for some reason they refuse to comment. (Anje? Koko? Hello?) (And yes, they're smart. And law students.)
Sixth, your mother is a whore.
haha, you can disclose my IQ and any other indicators of my intelligence (would you like a list, rude person i don't know?) in order to bash republicans any day.
-sarah
I don't mean to be rude, its just that sometimes, I get a little overexcited. After all, I just found out that geochemical climofunctions applied to Early Miocene strata exposed in the Ebro Basin, Spain, demonstrate that mean annual precipitation was the dominant control on paleosol type and indicate that the paleoclimate was considerably wetter during the Early Miocene, by up to 1150 mm yr-1, in comparison to modern values, placing it in a subhumid climatic regime rather than an arid-semiarid regime as previously suggested by sedimentological and paleontological approaches.
Lets see ADM call me the dumbest person on the blog now.
SJ
Phoebe: "Oh, ok, now, what do you think of Ranion’s new theory of species’ variegation in segmented arthopods?"
Joobs - that's you.
and you two have actually met before...briefly outside my apartment.
What is a joobs? Does that stand for my religion + bs?
Joobs: Jewish Male -> Jewish Boy -> Jew Boy --> Joo Boy -> Joobs.
Oh, I remember meeting geology girl. You purposely avoided me that entire weekend because you didn't want her to think you have loser friends. Well, I have the last laugh, because now she knows you have loser friends!
And how much time did you waste researching the exact language of the phoebe quote. You're at Harvard by god, shouldn't you be doing something obnoxious? At least when I post, it counts towards my billable hours requirement.
Joobs is almost as bad as that nickname AJ tried to give me, but which escapes me.
Ah, so the rain in spain falls mainly on the plain, except from 23-5 mya. Yeah, you're right...that's fascinating.
...and she's funny. Or at least, funnier than ADM.
1) Googling a quote from Friends is not difficult.
2) I think Sarah (using her name because she is) just laid the smack down more severely with more elegance than could have been imagined. I would add a Boo-yah if it wouldn't unbalance the delicate....Fuck it. BOOYAH.
Post a Comment